Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:23
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Rockets To Sign Jabari Smith Jr. To Five-Year Extension - Hoops Rumors
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What do you wear when you are alone at home?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Feather-legged lace weaver spider kills prey by covering it with toxic silk - Phys.org
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Shohei Ohtani throws fastest pitch of career at 101.7 mph in 3rd mound start for Dodgers - AP News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
The Best Lunch to Eat if You Have High Cholesterol, Recommended by a Dietitian - EatingWell
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: